I have been deeply saddened by the killing of Cecil the lion. And even more than that, by the reasons for the killing. I find it hard to believe that there are groups of individuals out there that kill simply for a trophy. And to think that symbol could possibly mean to those individuals their superiority over others for 'having' something rare and forbidden. Why is it that we tend to feel great and special just because we 'have' something that somebody else does not?
Another post I read was that "if we are playing the blame game then maybe we should blame poverty and corruption". Corruption can defiantly be blamed, but can poverty? I know from my own experiences thru travel to developing countries that there's a lot of people trying to make a buck any way they can. But is OK to blame poverty? Do we not all make choices with our personal moral compasses? For every person that is willing to do wrong, to feel like they are simply 'doing what they need to do to survive' - does it make their actions acceptable and OK?
In life I think there are always people that take advantage and people that don't. Whether we're poor, rich or otherwise. Is it OK to say poverty is the reason we make poor decisions? I don't think so. I think we are all responsible for our actions and decisions. Yes, poverty can easily provoke somebody to make the wrong decision and not listen to their moral compass. But it's the enablers, the people that make the transaction possible the real reasons behind the events. In this case it's the officials that turned a blind eye, and provided the supply, and it's even more so the individuals that demand the supply.
It's similar to this story: Many years ago my dad's friend was lamenting about a news article regarding Salmon in BC and the dwindling supply. He then went on about how wrong it was that first nations people had the right to fish whatever they wanted - (for their person use.) And it was their fault. I was young at the time and couldn't help but open my mouth and tell him 'well if people didn't buy the fish from the first nations people, (as it was not legal to do so) - like you do (at a much reduced price) - then I guess they wouldn't fish so much ". . . demand creates the supply.
The solution? I honestly don't know. Education is key. Education for everyone. We should be teaching compassion in schools from an early age and making it a central focus. It takes time to change a culture. But if you look over the history of people, slowly but surely we are as a whole becoming a kinder more compassionate group.
Another post I read was that "if we are playing the blame game then maybe we should blame poverty and corruption". Corruption can defiantly be blamed, but can poverty? I know from my own experiences thru travel to developing countries that there's a lot of people trying to make a buck any way they can. But is OK to blame poverty? Do we not all make choices with our personal moral compasses? For every person that is willing to do wrong, to feel like they are simply 'doing what they need to do to survive' - does it make their actions acceptable and OK?
In life I think there are always people that take advantage and people that don't. Whether we're poor, rich or otherwise. Is it OK to say poverty is the reason we make poor decisions? I don't think so. I think we are all responsible for our actions and decisions. Yes, poverty can easily provoke somebody to make the wrong decision and not listen to their moral compass. But it's the enablers, the people that make the transaction possible the real reasons behind the events. In this case it's the officials that turned a blind eye, and provided the supply, and it's even more so the individuals that demand the supply.
It's similar to this story: Many years ago my dad's friend was lamenting about a news article regarding Salmon in BC and the dwindling supply. He then went on about how wrong it was that first nations people had the right to fish whatever they wanted - (for their person use.) And it was their fault. I was young at the time and couldn't help but open my mouth and tell him 'well if people didn't buy the fish from the first nations people, (as it was not legal to do so) - like you do (at a much reduced price) - then I guess they wouldn't fish so much ". . . demand creates the supply.
The solution? I honestly don't know. Education is key. Education for everyone. We should be teaching compassion in schools from an early age and making it a central focus. It takes time to change a culture. But if you look over the history of people, slowly but surely we are as a whole becoming a kinder more compassionate group.
